CONTENT | LAST UPDATED |
---|---|
NEW
The deadline of preliminary submission has been extended. |
24th Sept. 2021 |
Preliminary submission entry for generators opens. | 20th Sept. 2021 |
Violin composers are now released. | 3rd Sept. 2021 |
The Computer Composition Identification Challenge, initiated by the Conference on Sound and Music Technology (CSMT), is succeeding the CSMT Data Challenge, 2020. This new challenge is dedicated to finding improved music generation models and objective evaluation models for a number of specified music styles.
There will be two roles competing against each other in this challenge: Generator versus Judge. Participants must choose one role and complete the corresponding tasks.
Generators are supposed to develop a system1 that can automatically generate a playable violin phrase with given beginning and ending bars, tempo value, key signature, and time signature.
Judges are supposed to analyse given music phrases and produce a Human Composition
Score
(HCS
) -- the probability of the input being composed by real human composers.
1: A system can consist of more than one objective model or rule sets.
The following participants will win the prizes:
• The Best Generator for the participant whose generator system obtains the highest score.
• The Best Judge for the participant whose judge system obtains the highest score.
• Creativity Award for the participant with the most creative solution, determined by the committee.
When the challenge begins, a list of violin composers will be released, where each violin composer has a specific music style.
For generator systems, 200 music phrases should be generated in the style of each composer in the list. The beginning and ending bars will not be specified until the final submission. This means the music phrases generated before the final submission can have arbitrary beginning and ends and should be able to generate with specified beginning and ending bars in the final stage.
For judge systems, participants are required to compute the probability of a given music phrase as the input being generated by generator systems, with the given composer’s name as the context. Throughout the development stage, only the composers’ own compositions (positive samples) are allowed to be used to train the judge system .
Upon requests from potential participants and in order to provide sufficient time for preliminary submissions in CCIC 2021, the organising committee has decided to extend the deadline of the preliminary round to 15th October 2021 for generators and 22nd October 2021 for judges. To check the updated deadlines for the subsequent steps, please refer to the timeline.
In addition, please notice that the submission requirements for judges have changed after the discussion and consideration of the CCIC Organising Committee:
For judges, preliminary submission is voluntary. Judges can still participate in the final round without any preliminary submission. Any valid submission record before the final submission deadline (6th Nov 2021) will be considered as completing the registration for this challenge. It is strongly recommended that judges participate in the preliminary submission, which will be a warm-up and a preparation for the final submission.
For generators, submissions for both preliminary and final round are still required.
The submission will be via Microsoft CMT. The preliminary submission entry for generators is now available. Please follow the instructions below and submit your generators.
At this stage, no technical report is required. Participants who chose generators should upload a zip
file named generator_output_preliminary.zip
that contains 8 folders: composer1
- composer8
. Each folder should have 200 MIDI files (100.mid
- 200.mid
), which are the output of your generator model.
The preliminary result contains two submission deadlines. The first deadline is for generators
to submit 200 music phrases for each composer. The second deadline is set around one week later to judges for submitting the HCS
results, which are the feedback for the
music phrases
generated by generators .
For generators, participants are required to complete both the preliminary submission and final submission. Any valid submission record in the preliminary submissions will be considered as completing the registration for this challenge but the submitted content will not affect the final score.
For judges, preliminary submission is voluntary. Participants can still participate in the final round (6th Nov 2021) without any preliminary submission. Any valid submission record before the final submission deadline will be considered as completing the registration for this challenge. It is strongly recommended that judges participate in the preliminary round, which will be a warm-up and a preparation for the final submission.
The last few days before the final submission deadline will be the evaluation stage, when 200 pairs of
beginnings and endings will be released for each composer's pieces in the list.
In 48 hours, generator systems should complete these music phrases and
submit them as their final submission. Then, these phrases will be compiled together and made available to
judge systems. From this moment on, in the next 48 hours, judge
systems are expected to calculate the HCS
s for these phrases and make the final submission. For
each composer, a certain number of extra phrases extracted from human-composed pieces will be mixed into the
input.
Generator scores are measured by are the average HCS
from all
judges.
Judge performances are ranked by the sum of the following two scores:
HCS
for human composed phrases.
1-HCS
for phrases generated by generators.
For detailed requirements, please refer to Submission Requirements .
For any enquires, contact us:
Yuqiang Li
and
Xuening Wang
, Challenge Coordinators, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University,